http://cineblog06.blogspot.com/2009/02/in-mood-for-love-wong-kar-wai-2000.htmlmood-for-love-wong-kar-wai-2000.html
http://zarawut.exteen.com/
http://filmsick.exteen.com/20071231/filmsick-2550
http://www.popcornmag.com/bbs/lofiversion/index.php?t619.html
http://dekku.nofatclips.com/2007/11/wong-kar-wai-theres-only-one-sun.html
http://heartfish.com/2008/10/07/wong-kar-wai/
Once I finished Andy's book, I went straight into a critical study on Wong Kar-Wai that James bought me for Christmas last year. Simply titled Wong Kar-Wai, it features three essays on his films (though it was published before In The Mood For Love), each taking a different approach at dissecting his style, finding what makes him stand apart from the other Hong Kong directors and why it works. Perhaps the most interesting theory advanced was that Kar-Wai's films seem jumpy and a non-linear because his storytelling is in a constant state of revolt. Common moments are always attempting to subvert the mechanics of plot, and images are always trying to express themselves as they are, as opposed to what they might be made into. When you add all of his films up, Kar-Wai has only been making one movie all along, each an additional piece of a larger whole. Hence, despite the sequel to Days of Being Wild never being made, we do get the main character from that sequel invading the film's final scenes.
That's about the only theory the filmmaker himself seems to agree with. Wong Kar-Wai is rounded out with an interview with the man where he bats away any attempts at scholarly context on the part of the interviewer, and reveals himself as an unassuming artist who relies more on instinct and personal feeling than any grand scheme. He is also a true maverick in a film industry obsessed with the bottom line, bucking the idea that one flop should end your career. It's also refreshing to hear someone doesn't want to work in Hollywood.
My only complaint about the book is that, despite some nice, sturdy printing and a picture-laden layout, the proofreading was terrible. There was an inconsistency to grammar style and laziness in typesetting that seemed rather daft given the rather haughty approach of the work itself.http://confessions123.blogspot.com/2003_12_01_archive.html
http://skyexits.blogspot.com/2008/04/wong-kar-wai-advertising-director-new.html http://bitdepth.tumblr.com/post/143802443/maggie-cheung-in-wong-kar-wais-in-the-mood-for
http://thaiindie.com/wizContent.aspwizConID=610&txtmMenu_ID=7 http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/directors/02/wong.html http://wkwai.free.fr/ http://culturazzi.org/review/cinema/film-reviews/chinese-cinema/fallen-angels-wong-kar-wai http://www.wongkarwai.net/forums/viewtopic.phpt=2254&sid=ec64f2acea9e3b94d3a008a4095481dc http://www.chinesecinemas.org/inthemood.html
http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/1102&032007/life01.html http://swiftywriting.blogspot.com/2007_06_01_archive.html http://shimajournal.org/issues/v1n1/k.%20Biancorosso%20Shima%20v1n1.pdf
http://hub.hku.hk/handle/123456789/40398 http://muse.jhu.edu/subject_browse?jump=Wong%2C%20Kar-wai%2C%201958-%20--%20Criticism%20and%20interpretation.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น